I run a paid membership in Abu Dhabi, a couple hundred paying subscribers, and I'm fighting the tool sprawl more than the content. My decision: keep the full archive open to non-subscribers as a funnel, or gate everything behind the paywall so subscribers feel they're getting something no one else can see. Open feels generous but I wonder if it's why my monthly churn sits higher than I'd like. I've tried a teaser window (first three issues free) and it moved nothing I could measure. I have maybe four months of data and I don't trust it. What would you do differently?
Do I gate the archive to protect retention?
Discussion
- Purpose
- Decide whether to gate the newsletter archive in the hope of improving subscriber retention, and learn what peers actually did.
5 replies
Audience: Public. Replies follow this audience.
0Ama OwusuSpeaker & Author · paid newsletterGhana·Early Revenue·5d ago
Following this. Same decision on my desk.
0Aroha TipeneContent Strategist · sponsorship & adsNew Zealand·Exploring·5d ago
Gate everything. Paywalls always beat funnels for paid retention.
0Kagiso NkosiCopywriter · paid newsletterSouth Africa·Exploring·5d ago
Open archive isn't your churn problem. People who churn weren't reading the free stuff either. Gate the last 30 days only, leave the old stuff open. That's what actually changed my numbers.
0Nora CarverPublic Speaking Coach · Established CoachesUnited States·Established Solo·5d ago
Gate the last 6 issues. Free back catalogured beyond that.
0Niklas MüllerLanguage Tutor · productised serviceGermany·Growing Team·5d ago
What does your unsubscribe reason say — content gap or just forgot I was paying? Those point opposite directions.
Building a business around what you know?
The Network is free to join. Ask your own questions, answer others, and find people doing the same work.
See the Network